Meet the Ulyanovsk: Russia’s 85,000 Ton Monster Aircraft Carrier

0 0

Here’s What You Need To Know:Russia now seems willing to revive its supercarrier dream. The navy will havean aircraft carrier, Russian navy chief Adm. Viktor Chirkov recently said. The research companies are working on it.

Had she ever sailed, the Soviet supercarrierUlyanovskwould have been a naval behemoth more than 1,000 feet long, with an 85,000-ton displacement and enough storage to carry an air group of up to 70 fixed and rotary wing aircraft.

With a nuclear-powered engineand working in conjunction with other Soviet surface warfare vessels and submarinesthe supercarrier would have steamed through the oceans with a purpose.

Namely, to keep the U.S. Navy away from the Motherlands shores.

But theUlyanovskis a tantalizing almost of history. Moscow never finished the project, because it ran out of money. As the Cold War ended, Russia plunged into years of economic hardship that made building new ships impossible.

TheUlyanovskdied in the scrap yards in 1992. But now the Kremlin is spending billions of rubles modernizing its militaryand wants a new supercarrier to rival the United States.

(Recommended:Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships?)

Big Goals, Bad Timing:

Builders laid the keel for theUlyanovskin 1988, just as the Soviet empire began to break apart. The ship was such a large project that builders wouldnt have finished her until the mid 90s.

Construction took place at the Black Sea Shipyard in Ukraineoften called Nikolayev South Shipyard 444. Its an old facility, dating back to the 18th century when Prince Grigory Potemkin signed orders in 1789 authorizing new docks to repair Russian naval vessels damaged during the Russo-Turkish War.

The famous Russian battleshipPotemkinscene of the famous 1905 naval mutiny and the subject of Sergei Eisensteins classic filmlaunched from the same shipyard.

Early in the Soviet period, the shipyard constructed battleships. During the 60s and 70s, workers builtMoskva-class helicopter carriers andKiev-class carriers at South Shipyard 444.

But none of these ships came close to theUlyanovsk.

Named after Vladimir Lenins hometown, everything about the supercarrier was huge, even by Russian standards.

(Recommended:Russia’s 5 Most Dangerous Warplanes)

Her propulsion system would have comprised four KN-3 nuclear reactors, a model originally used to power enormousKirov-class battlecruisers, such as the heavy guided-missile cruiserFrunze.Ulyanovskcould have easily reached 30 knots while under way.

The carrier would have carried at least 44 fighters on boarda combination of Su-33 and MiG-29 attack jets configured for carrier operations.Ulyanovsks two steam catapults, ski-jump and four sets of arresting cables would have created a bustling flight deck.

The ships designers planned three elevatorseach capable of carrying 50 tonsto move aircraft to and from the cavernous hanger deck. Plus, the carrier would have had helicopters for search-and-rescue work and anti-submarine warfare missions.

(Recommended:Europe’s 5 Most Lethal Weapons of War)

The Soviets planned a complement of 3,400 sailorsroughly half of the crew aboard an AmericanNimitz-class carrier, but sizable compared to other Soviet vessels.

Why Build It?:

That the Soviets even wanteda supercarrier was remarkable. The massive ships have never figured significantly in the Soviet or Russian naval inventory.

Currently, Russia has only one carrierthe significantly smallerAdmiral Kuznetsovlaunched in 1985. Multiple mechanical problems have plagued the ship ever since, and she doesnt go anywhere without an accompanying tug vessel.

But there was a logic behind theUlyanovsk. James Holmes, a professor of strategy at the U.S. Naval War College, explained that the Soviets wanted to create a defensive blue belt in their offshore waters.

The blue belt was a combination of land, sea and air power that would work together to thwart U.S. carrier and submarine forces. Russia could defend the homeland while providing safe patrol areas for ballistic-missile subs performing nuclear deterrent missions.

Those boomers need to disappear for weeks at a time into safe depths, Holmes said. Soviet supercarriers could have helped out with the air- and surface-warfare components of a blue-belt defense, chasing off U.S. Navy task forces that steamed into Eurasian waters.

But pride and national honor also prompted the decision to build theUlyanovsk.

Theres also the keeping-up-with-the-Joneses aspect to carrier development, Holmes continued. If the U.S. is the world superpower and the U.S.S.R. wants to keep pace, then Soviet leaders want the same toys to demonstrate that theyre keeping pace. It sounds childish, but there are basic human motives at work here.

Its not all about the roles and missions carriers execute, he said. Its about national destiny and dignity.

But by the mid 90s, Russian naval vessels were rusting at their moorings, sailors served without pay and the United States stepped in to help deactivate Soviet-era nuclear submarines and provide security for the Russian nuclear arsenal.

The Soviets werent dumb, Holmes explained. They wouldnt spend themselves into oblivion to keep up with the Joneses, and as a great land power, they obviously had enormous claims on their resources to fund the army and air force. There was only so much to go around for luxury fleet projects.

Bottom line, if you cant afford to keep the existing fleet at sea, where are you going to get the money to complete your first nuclear-powered supercarrier, a vessel that will demand even more manpower that you cant afford?

Moscows Military Rises Againor Not?:

But Russia now seems willing to revive its supercarrier dream. The navy will havean aircraft carrier, Russian navy chief Adm. Viktor Chirkov recently said. The research companies are working on it.

Other Russian media reportsindicatethat designers are in the early phases of planning a new carrier class that would be slightly larger than theNimitzclassand capable of holding an air wing of 100 planes.

But economic problems including a looming recession and the expense of maintaining and modernizing the rest of the nations aging fleetmakes it doubtfulwhether Russiacanbuild such an expensive ship.

Holmes estimates the cost of a new Russian carrier could be as much as $8.5 billion and take up to seven years to complete. But the professor also said the Russian quest for a carrieris serious.

Great nations have carriers, Russia considers itself a great nation, and therefore the ship would be a symbol of national revival and destiny. In other words, a new carrier would be one more reason to forget the bad old days when the Soviet Union disintegrated.

We think of the Soviet Union as a dreary place, but Russians also remember that it wielded great power, Holmes continued. Thats a potent memory.

For Moscows navy, the failure of theUlyanovskproject is one of the biggest, baddest memories of them all.

This firstappeared back in 2015.

Image Credit:Imgur.


You might also like
Leave A Reply

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More