Texas Democrats Plan to Flee State to Highlight G.O.P. Voting Restrictions
WASHINGTON Democrats in the Texas Legislature are making plans to flee the state on Monday ahead of expected votes on new voting laws, and head to Washington to spotlight what they say is a crippling Republican assault on the ability to cast a ballot.
The group had arranged for a pair of chartered flights from Austin with plans to arrive in the nations capital by the early evening. It was unclear as of midday how many Democrats might flee and if it would be enough to prevent Texas Republicans from attaining a quorum, which is required to conduct state business.
The cohort of Democrats were aiming to transform themselves into the nations new symbols in the fight for voting rights, according to several people familiar with their plans. The goal is to apply pressure to Democrats in the U.S. Senate who so far have been unable to pass federal legislation to address the issue.
With President Biden planning to deliver a major speech on voting rights on Tuesday in Philadelphia, the exodus from Texas could lead to dueling showdowns in Austin and Washington.
The dramatic departure would be the second time in six weeks Texas Democrats have used that tactic to try to prevent passage of a new voting bill. Hours before the State Legislatures regularly planned session ended in May, state House Democrats walked out of the Capitol chamber, denying Republicans a quorum.
In Texas, blocking a legislative quorum requires not just abandoning the State Capitol but leaving the state. If the lawmakers remain in Texas, state law enforcement officials including the Texas Rangers can be dispatched to round them up and return them to the statehouse for votes a process that happened in 2003 when, on separate occasions, Democratic lawmakers fled to New Mexico and Oklahoma in an effort to avoid Republican legislation to redraw the states congressional districts.
Over the last several months, Democrats across the country have been grappling with one of the most sweeping contractions of voting access in generations. Republican-controlled legislatures in more than 14 states have passed new election laws that include broad new restrictions to voting.
But the bill in Texas is among the most expansive and sweeping efforts to restrict voting in a state that already ranks as one of the most difficult in the country to cast a ballot, with Democrats and voting rights groups contending that passage of the bill threatens the very democratic foundations of the state.
Over the weekend, the Texas House and Senate, both controlled by Republicans, advanced legislation out of committee to the full chamber, after marathon sessions that, in the case of the House, lasted nearly 24 hours. G.O.P. leaders planned to move toward a final vote starting Tuesday.
A spokesman for Dade Phelan, the Republican speaker of the House, said that the speaker did not have a statement at this time.
Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, responded to the initial walkout by calling a 30-day special session that began Thursday. Along with the voting proposals, the governor called for the Legislature to take up measures combating perceived censorship on social media platforms; banning the teaching of critical race theory in public schools; further limiting abortions; putting in place new border security policies; and restricting transgender athletes from competing in school sports.
Mr. Abbott is up for re-election next year and faces primary challenges from multiple conservative Republicans, including former Representative Allen West, whose tenure as chairman of the Republican Party of Texas ended over the weekend. He has said that overhauling the states electoral system is one of his top priorities.
Republicans in the Legislature, led by Bryan Hughes, the chairman of the State Senate Affairs Committee, say new legislation is intended to create a better election process thats safe and accessible.
Texas Democrats used their temporary victory in May to draw attention to their efforts to block new Republican voting laws and the Senate debate over whether to pass federal protections for voters. They traveled to Washington to lobby senators at the Capitol and met with Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House.
But efforts by congressional Democrats to pass a sweeping new voting law, the For the People Act, stalled last month when Republicans blocked it in the Senate.
There has been little evidence the Texas Democrats have improved their position since their initial walkout.
Despite high hopes last November, Democrats remain in the minority in both Texas legislative chambers and their options are limited. If they remain out of state and deny a quorum until the special session concludes at the end of the month, Mr. Abbott can simply call another one. He is certain to call at least one more session later this year to pass new congressional and legislative maps and allocate billions of dollars in federal pandemic relief funding.
In addition, there is no indication that there are 50 Senate Democrats willing to pass voter protections on a simple majority vote, a move that would require weakening the filibuster. At least a half dozen Democratic senators, a group whose most outspoken figures are Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, have expressed their resistance to such a move.
The Texas Democrats escape follows several days of internal deliberations about how aggressively to resist the Republican proposals on voting. While a group of progressive young lawmakers advocated leaving the state, the partys leadership had been more cautious, pushing a plan to force a series of votes on amendments aimed at watering down the voting bill.
Were going to fight to kill the bill, were going to use procedure and the rule book to make sure that a bad bill doesnt pass, State Representative Rafael Anchia, the chairman of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, said on Friday. The first approach is going to be to fight the bill head on.
The Republican voting proposals, among other provisions, would ban 24-hour voting and drive-through voting; add new voter identification requirements for voting by mail; increase the criminal penalties for election workers who run afoul of regulations; and greatly expand the authority and autonomy of partisan poll watchers.
Most of the discussion about preventing a quorum has come from the State House, which has a larger contingent of younger and progressive Democrats than does the Senate. In the State House, it takes 55 of 67 Democrats leaving the state to block a vote. In the Senate, it requires 11 of 13 Democrats.
Democratic reluctance to fleeing the state evaporated over the weekend as liberal activists, Texas citizens and Beto ORourke, the former congressman who is the state partys most popular figure, testified at a hearing beginning Saturday morning that lasted nearly 24 hours.
By late Sunday afternoon there was sufficient momentum toward leaving that Democratic leaders who had privately warned against doing so came on board with the plan.
While leaving the state is certain to bring a flood of attention and provide a boost to fund-raising, the move is not without risks. Beyond being away from home and their families for several weeks, Texas state legislators are part time and many work other jobs they may not be able to report to remotely. And without a quorum, lawmakers will not be able to authorize funding for salaries for themselves or their staff, which Mr. Abbott vetoed in June after the first walkout.
Additionally, they might come under criticism from those who believe they are abdicating their responsibility for representing the citizens who elected them.